An argument against the national civil rights act extending a protected status to homosexuals

The most common legal application of the term civil rights involves the rights guaranteed to U.

An argument against the national civil rights act extending a protected status to homosexuals

Image via Gage Skidmore. Note that I do not know whether Shapiro even knows of this article, nor will I reach out to him. I expected, therefore, to see a little give-and-take, some dumb, bait-y questions, but also a few good ones, too, that he was perhaps not used to.

Well, I was wrong, to put it mildly. Not exactly the hallmark of a probing and far-ranging mind. In the end, however, principles are nothing without some bedrock of reality, a thing Shapiro desperately needs a dose of after years of arguing with liberal caricatures on TV and brain-dead college campuses.

An argument against the national civil rights act extending a protected status to homosexuals

But whereas the Left is often either absurdly reductive or needlessly complicated on any given issue, Shapiro prefers both, limiting the world to sound-bites even as he throws in pointless variables that ultimately confuse even Shapiro.

Now, there is lots to get through, so let us start where my curiosity first began: The top-rated question — which Ben Shapiro no doubt saw — was this: You voiced your displeasure in the past at how it is unethical to force pro-lifers to fund Planned Parenthood through tax dollars.

An argument against the national civil rights act extending a protected status to homosexuals

Do you also think it is unethical to force certain people to fund the subsidies of meat and dairy products if they do not believe those products are ethical? Thanks Good question, but with a poor follow-up that unnecessarily gives Shapiro a way out of the logical conundrum.

If it is in fact unethical to force someone to dole out tax money for something he does not believe in, then it stands to reason that other protected classes must exist, as well.

Now, it is quite possible that Shapiro might demarcate abortion from all other exceptions, but why — when the standard is mere personal revulsion — stop at abortion?

There are countless other logical categories, from pacifists funding war, to Jainists chipping in for road-cleaning, where the offended party might feel just as strongly against some item of the Social Contract that the rest of us must consent to. More, note how abortion is utterly divorced in this case from the global libertarian scope.

Civil Rights

Shapiro is not even making a libertarian argument against abortion — for there is no such thing, as I will later show — but appealing to an individual tax code by way of a local ethic damning that and only that tax. Not that it matters, however. From the libertarian perspective, they are arguing for a system that — for good reason — has NEVER been implemented in its pure form.

More pointedly, however, libertarianism suffers from the same endless purity-testing that its hated mirror image — stateless communism — undergoes, with every iteration of Stalin, Lenin, the Paris Commune, etc. Yet, again, Ben is silent on a tough query, forcing me to dig up other materials where he makes his position clear: The wealthy in this country are by and large the job creators.

Tax them, and they will cut jobs because it impedes their ability to create. A flat tax is the best balance between equity and efficiency.

If someone has a smaller pie, a smaller piece will be taken out of the pie. A controversial point of view, as far as the research goes, yet look at how confident Shapiro is at his own pronouncements.

To be sure, there has been exactly ZERO evidence that taxation is anything more than 1 a collective means of ensuring social goods that an individual cannot guarantee; 2 equity.United States History I.

Why Jews Push Gay Marriage | Real Jew News

Introduction United States History, story of how the republic developed from colonial beginnings in the 16th century, when the first European explorers arrived, until modern times. Mississippi Freedom Summer Events Photos [Terminology — Various authors use either "Freedom Summer" or "Summer Project" or both book uses "Summer Project" to refer specifically to the project organized and led by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and the Council of Federated .

Philippine troops and police forcibly evacuated villages vulnerable to landslides after the collapse of a mountainside buried homes and killed at. Civil rights groups looked to Congress to restore rights previously recognized, but presidential vetoes scuttled such measures until Despite Dr.

King’s commitment to nonviolence, the struggle for civil rights was not always a peaceful one. White violence against civil . Finally, in December , the Justice Department invoked its powers authorized by the Civil Rights Act of to file a suit against seventy parties accused of . The underlying principle of the ADA was to extend the basic civil rights protections extended to minorities and women to people with disabilities.

The Civil Rights Act prohibited employment discrimination by the private sector against women and racial and ethnic minorities, and banned discrimination against minorities in public accommodations.

Annenberg Classroom - Speak Outs - What are the civil rights issues of today?