Critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale

Once in a bog, a frog sat under a Sumac tree and croaked all night in a loud and unpleasant voice. The other creatures loathed his voice but their complaints, insults and brickbats couldn't stop him from croaking stubbornly and pompously, insensitive to the disturbance he was causing. Then, one night a nightingale appears at the bog.

Critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale

One is talented and modest, and the other cunning and manipulative. She was a pleasant bird that sang in a melodious voice, but for her lack of confidence and self-reliance she falls prey to the manipulation of the frog and becomes a victim of his evil plan. The frog misuses her for his gain till she has died and he has grabbed his domain back.

The ugly toad kept singing in his loathsome voice from dawn till dusk. The animals living in the bog had to bear the crass cacophony because the ugly toad was not willing to stop. One would hardly call it singing because everyone knows that frogs can croak and annoy, not sing.

Critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale

He was a determined singer who would not be buzzed by threats or insults. However, the creatures living in the bog were soon to be relieved from his ugly day and night croaking because a nightingale flew to the bog and started singing.

Critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale

As she sang, perched on a tree, the toad was dumbstruck by the melody of her song. The other creatures were also hypnotized by the beauty of her voice. They swam to the tree where the nightingale sang and admired her voice and her melodious song. The nightingale was not used to such grand applause and felt flattered.

Analysis of The Frog and the Nightingale

She sang till dawn break. Next night, when the Nightingale was again preparing to start singing, she heard a croak and inquired who it was. He talked to the nightingale and told her that he is the owner of the tree she is sitting upon and that he is well known throughout the bog for his splendid baritone.

Like a critic, he talked to her about her song and that she used a good technique but her song was too long and lacked certain critical elements. The manipulative frog could see that the nightingale was an innocent creature and easily fell for flattery.

The nightingale easily believed what the frog said and felt flattered that a critic of such renown appreciated her work. She modestly accepted that while she did not believe that her song was divine still it was original and her own.

The frog affirmed that she was a good singer but not as good as she could be with the training only few like him could provide.

Critical Appreciation Of The Frog And The Nightingale experimented with new ideas and concepts. Keats is generally considered the most tragic of the Romantic poets as he was faced by a series of sad experiences in his life. Short Critical Analysis of the Frog and the Nightingale. This is a short critical analysis of the Frog and the Nightingale. Any creative work of art including poetry is open to multiple interpretations and perspectives. The Frog and the nightingale by Vikram Seth describes the present scenario of our social world. It says how a person tries to down somebody when one is succeeding in his or he r live.

Without the training she was nothing else but just a beginner and with his training she could prove herself the best of all. This was really too much for the nightingale who had never heard such praise and could hardly see what the frog was trying to do.

She was an innocent creature with a great voice and a weakness for praise. In modesty, she called the frog a Mozart in disguise and asked him to guide her. The frog replied that he would charge a modest fee.

The nightingale was feeling enthralled and inspired and sang with such devotion that animals came from miles away to listen to her. The frog charged the animals that came to her concert.

Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Stanza

Next morning, her training began while it was raining.Critical Appreciation Of The Frog And The Nightingale experimented with new ideas and concepts. Keats is generally considered the most tragic of the Romantic poets as he was faced by a series of sad experiences in his life.

critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale Page 3 of results for the term 'critical appreciation of the frog and the nightingale' Sponsered Links.

Home For The Aged,Old Age Homes,Home For Disabled,Home Nursing,Home For initiativeblog.com Foe Mentally Retarded,paralysis t. You just clipped your first slide!

Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later. Now customize the name of a clipboard to store your clips.

Critical Appreciation Of The Poem The Frog And The Nightingale ´╗┐Critical appreciation of a poem is defined as the critical reading of a poem. The meaning of its words, its rhyme, scheme, the speaker, figures of speech, the references to other works (intertextuality).

Short Critical Analysis of the Frog and the Nightingale. This is a short critical analysis of the Frog and the Nightingale. Any creative work of art including poetry is open to multiple interpretations and perspectives.

The Frog and the Nightingale by Vikram Seth utilizes its stanzas and rhyme scheme to portray a fictional story of two animals who sing. One is a frog, and the other is a .

The Frog And the Nightingale |authorSTREAM